ARCHIVES

Board of Scientific Advisors discussion: Are peer reviewers correctly interpreting the guidelines?

This article is from The Cancer Letter archive.

Vol. 30 No. 12 | March 19, 2004

Download PDF Visit The Full Archive

Related Articles

Sen. Specter Vows to “Stay and Fight” For Health, Education, On Subcommittee.

February 11, 2005

Study Finds More Deaths On Aranesp Arm In Cancer Anemia Study, No Benefit Seen.

February 2, 2007

Strict Regulation Of Tobacco Products Proposed in Senate

November 24, 1989

Army Hopes To Fund “Middle-Risk, high Payoff” Research With Breast Cancer money. Travis Says

February 19, 1993

In Brief: Fidler Wins BMS Cancer Research Award; Thomas Cech To Head Howard Hughs Inst.

April 2, 1999

ASCO honors physicians for clinical trials participation.

June 4, 2004