ARCHIVES

Board of Scientific Advisors discussion: Are peer reviewers correctly interpreting the guidelines?

This article is from The Cancer Letter archive.

Vol. 30 No. 12 | March 19, 2004

Download PDF Visit The Full Archive

Related Articles

RPR Grant To NABCO Does Not Support Advocacy, Firm Says

November 10, 1995

Mass. ACS Offers Three Programs For Young Investigators

July 24, 1987

ACR Defends Mammographic Exams For Women 35-40,Says Carcinogenic Threat Is “Small”

July 30, 1976

Medicare increases payments for oncology infusion and begins a one-year demonstration project that pays oncologists to assess the side effects of chemotherapy.

November 5, 2004

Dana-Farber And Merck To Collaborate On Therapeutics.

February 15, 2008

Judge Hears Arguments In Fisher’s Privacy Act Suit Over Databases

January 19, 1996