ARCHIVES

NIH oncology peer reviewers are protesting the outcome of a recent meeting in which their own grant applications fared so poorly that the reviewers said they were penalized for their service.

This article is from The Cancer Letter archive.

Vol. 31 No. 18 | May 6, 2005

Download PDF Visit The Full Archive

Related Articles

AOR And PRN, Two Largest Oncology Practice Management Firms, To Merge

December 18, 1998

Halterman, Mahoney And Their Grants Go To DCT, Along With Some Program Projects

March 17, 1978

Administration Seeks Increase In FDA Budget.

June 13, 2008

Varmus: Why are scientific societies obstructing public access to research results?

May 20, 2005

Patient Advocacy: Policy Should Prevent Employers From Using Genetic Test Results

April 11, 1997

In Brief: McDonnell Foundation Selects Five For $400,000 Fellowships; Alberts, Verma Picked For Awards

January 4, 1991